{"id":16490,"date":"2023-01-06T14:30:13","date_gmt":"2023-01-06T20:30:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/?p=16490"},"modified":"2024-11-27T11:05:09","modified_gmt":"2024-11-27T17:05:09","slug":"quest-ce-que-lestetrol","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/fr\/what-is-estetrol\/","title":{"rendered":"Estetrol (E4) : Ce qu'il faut savoir sur la forme alternative d'\u0153strog\u00e8ne dans une nouvelle pilule contraceptive"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Estetrol: They\u2019re calling it \u201cthe future of the Pill.\u201d But how could this steroid once deemed to be a \u201cweak estrogen,\u201d \u2013and which is only naturally produced by the livers of babies in utero\u2013end up as a main ingredient in the latest formulation of hormonal birth control? And is there any truth to the claim that contraceptives containing estetrol are \u201cmore environmentally friendly\u201d<\/a> than the typical Pill and other drugs containing different synthetic estrogens?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What is estetrol (E4)? <\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The human body can produce four types of estrogen (estriol, estrone, estradiol, and estetrol), and one of those is made only by babies in utero. According to this textbook<\/a>, \u201cEstetrol is a unique human pregnancy hormone produced by the fetal liver early during pregnancy and found in the mother at exponentially growing concentrations during gestation, with fetal levels about 10 times higher than maternal levels\u201d [1]. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

While estetrol was first discovered<\/a> in 1965, more research into it was largely abandoned for nearly four decades after it was pronounced a \u201cweak estrogen\u201d [2]. Even now, estetrol\u2019s (E4) specific function(s) for mom or baby are still poorly understood. In general, estetrol levels are considered an indicator of fetoplacental (baby and placenta) health<\/a>, such that falling maternal serum levels (measured through a blood draw) of estetrol or estriol (another estrogen, produced by the placenta) are troubling, and suggestive of a problem with the baby and\/or the placenta. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Which contraceptives use E4, and why does it matter?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In 2021, a hormonal contraceptive combination of the progestin drospirenone and estetrol (trade name Nextstellis) received FDA approval. While drospirenone is nothing new (it\u2019s the same synthetic progestin found in \u201cYaz\u201d or \u201cYasmin\u201d birth control pills), the introduction of estetrol in combination with drospirenone caused a stir. That\u2019s because, historically, adjustments to \u201cthe Pill” have revolved around switching up the type of progestin used, or decreasing the amount of synthetic estrogen in an effort to minimize side effects. But birth control containing estetrol is novel because estetrol is a different type<\/em> of estrogen altogether. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Furthermore, E4 appears to be particularly effective at preventing pregnancy. Like conventional hormonal birth control, Nextstellis works in three ways: by preventing ovulation, negatively impacting sperm motility (via thickening of the woman’s cervical mucus), and thinning the endometrial lining (to prevent implantation, should ovulation and conception still manage to occur). While the typical combined oral contraceptive pill is 99% effective with perfect use and 91% effective with typical use<\/a>, in a 12-month,13-cycle research trial <\/a>of over 1,800 women, Nextstellis was more than 98% effective at preventing pregnancy with perfect use and more than 97% effective with typical use [3].  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Side effects of estetrol (E4) vs. ethinylestradiol (EE2)<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Conventional hormonal birth control contains ethinylestradiol (EE2), the synthetic version of estradiol associated with increased risk for blood clots and other potentially serious (or even fatal) vascular problems, like heart attacks or strokes. As mentioned above, Nexstellis utilizes estetrol instead of ethinylestradiol, which is considered less likely to cause these types of problems, and why it is therefore being labeled as safer for women to take. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Why might estetrol cause fewer troublesome side effects than typical formulations of the Pill? Estetrol is called the first Native Estrogen with Selective actions in Tissues (NEST), because it binds selectively to<\/a> some, but not all <\/em>of the same estrogen receptors in the body as ethinylestradiol does. For example, both estetrol and ethinylestradiol bind to estrogen receptors in the liver and in bone, but estetrol also binds in a targeted way to receptors in the uterus, while ethinylestradiol does not. And while ethinylestradiol binds to receptors in the breast, leading to rapid cell growth (read: potential places for cancer to start), estetrol does so to a much lesser extent. Early research in animals<\/a> corroborated this, finding that E4 has much less impact on breast tissue compared to EE2 [2]. The selective binding explains why E4 is thought to have fewer androgenic (male hormone) side effects like increased body hair, acne, decreased sex drive, and mood swings compared to EE2. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Is birth control containing estetrol environmentally friendly?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Estetrol may be less toxic<\/em> to the environment compared to ethinylestradiol. First, it\u2019s true that estetrol is \u201cplant-based\u201d or derived from plant sources. Still, it goes through a multistep production process in a lab to be usable in Nextstellis, just like EE2 does to be used in other forms of hormonal birth control. Second, it\u2019s also true that E4 lasts much longer in the body than EE2. How does this translate to environmental friendliness? Because<\/em> E4 is more stable than EE2, i.e. has a longer half-life, it does not break down rapidly and get peed out (eventually polluting the waterways) to nearly the same extent. In a safety study, only scant amounts of biologically active E4 were detectable in women\u2019s urine, and researchers found<\/a>  \u201cE4 does not accumulate in living organisms and is likely to dissipate rapidly from water and sediment.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Natural Womanhood has reported several times on the environmental un<\/em>friendliness of EE2-containing hormonal birth control, especially its concerning impacts of feminizing fish and decreasing sperm counts due to tainted water sources (since water treatment facilities don\u2019t have the capability to adequately filter out the estrogen and progestin metabolites). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

While mainstream media has previously shied away from admitting the environmental havoc wreaked by synthetic estrogen, a press release<\/a> touting estetrol\u2019s environmental friendliness openly acknowledged that \u201cEE2 is a synthetic estrogen, designed to be resistant to degradation and inactivation. It was intended to have comparable biological activities as [natural estradiol] E2, but more persistent due to its stability in the human body. Because of these properties, EE2 persists longer and accumulates more in the environment than natural estrogens\u2026.EE2 is considered to be a strong environmental endocrine disruptor which accumulates in living organisms impacting ecosystems.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The negative effects of EE2 in fish include \u201creduced egg production, reduced testicular growth, delayed maturation, development of ova-testes in males and development of the populations with skewed female to male ratios (i.e. feminization).\u201d In contrast, only scant amounts of ingested E4 were measured in study subjects\u2019 urine, and E4 was not found to have the negative reproductive effects of EE2 on other aquatic organisms. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Separating reality from hype<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A goodRx review<\/a> of estetrol praised \u201cthe first new estrogen approved by the FDA in 50 years.\u201d Nextstellis\u2019 website<\/a> touts decreased rates of breakthrough bleeding amongst research study participants compared to other forms of hormonal birth control, as well as decreased negative effects on liver function. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

All the same, the product label reads very similarly to those of other hormonal birth control products. A warning at the top of the Nextstellis product insert<\/a> reads \u201cFemales over 35 years old who smoke should not use NEXTSTELLIS (4<\/a>) Cigarette smoking increases the risk of serious cardiovascular events from combination oral contraceptive (COC) use. (4<\/a>)\u201d Nextstellis is contraindicated in any woman with a high risk for arterial or venous blood clots, or with current or past breast cancer, liver problems, kidney problems, adrenal insufficiency, and\/or abnormal uterine bleeding without a known cause. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In research studies<\/a>, nearly 10% of women discontinued Nextstellis, and 58% of all women reported at least one of the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n