{"id":21258,"date":"2024-08-15T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-08-15T13:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/?p=21258"},"modified":"2024-09-18T13:22:06","modified_gmt":"2024-09-18T18:22:06","slug":"llegar-a-juicio","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/es\/arrive-trial\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00bfFue err\u00f3neo el ensayo de inducci\u00f3n del parto ARRIVE?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Over the last 30 years, labor induction rates have <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.lww.com\/mcnjournal\/citation\/2022\/07000\/trends_in_labor_induction_in_the_united_states,.13.aspx#:~:text=Induction%20of%20labor%20in%20the%20United%20States%20has%20more%20than,births%20in%202020%20(Figure).\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">tripled<\/a> [1]. Why have they risen so rapidly, and has this increase been for the betterment of fetal and maternal health? In 2018, the ARRIVE trial seemed to suggest that labor induction for low-risk, first-time mothers at 39 weeks gestation was safer than waiting for labor to start on its own. But a 2024 study from Victoria, Australia published in the journal <em>Birth Issues In Perinatal Care <\/em>calls the ARRIVE trial&#8217;s findings into question [2].&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-what-did-the-arrive-trial-find\"><span id=\"what-did-the-arrive-trial-find\">What did the ARRIVE trial find?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Since its publication in 2018, the ARRIVE trial has been cited as evidence that elective inductions at 39 weeks are safer than an expectant management approach to birth (i.e., letting labor start on its own). Pre-2018, however, induction of labor was widely understood to <em>increase<\/em> the risk of Cesarean section (C-section), compared to expectant management. While induction has a place in evidence-based perinatal care, historically, it was not encouraged for low-risk women.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But the 2018 ARRIVE trial (A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management), published in the <em>New England Journal of Medicine<\/em>, wanted to assess whether elective induction at 39 weeks gestation of pregnancy might be a safer birth plan for low-risk first-time moms and their babies [3]. In this <a href=\"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/reasons-to-be-induced\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">trial<\/a> that took place at 41 hospitals across the United States, the researchers randomly assigned 3,062 low-risk women to be induced at 39 weeks (the experimental group), and 3,044 low-risk women to an expectant management approach to labor (the control group). \u201cExpectant management\u201d during the trial meant that women in the control group could go into labor naturally, be induced for medical reasons, or choose induction <em>after <\/em>40 weeks and 5 days gestation\u2014unlike the women in the experimental group, who were simply induced at 39 weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Even though the ARRIVE trial found that induction did <em>not <\/em>significantly decrease stillbirth occurrences or neonatal death, they did report a 3% lower rate of C-Section (18.6%) for the induction group compared to the expectant management group (22.2%). They also found that the induction group was 5% less likely to develop high blood pressure, <em>and<\/em> they were discharged from the hospital earlier than the expectant management group. Based on these findings, the researchers concluded that elective induction at 39 weeks might <em>reduce<\/em> C-Section risk compared to expectant management of labor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-what-explains-the-unusual-findings-of-the-arrive-trial\"><span id=\"what-explains-the-unusual-findings-of-the-arrive-trial\">What explains the unusual findings of the ARRIVE trial?<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Again, the conventional wisdom prior to ARRIVE was that elective induction would increase a woman&#8217;s risk of C-Section. So, ARRIVE&#8217;s findings were somewhat unexpected! However, several factors are worth noting when unpacking this trial and its conclusions about labor induction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For example, the healthcare providers for the experimental (39-week induced mothers) group were instructed to be diligent in best practices for labor induction, such as waiting longer for the women to give birth vaginally than many providers do before recommending a C-Section. This may be why the C-Section rate for the induced mothers was only 19%, even though the U.S. average is significantly higher: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.axios.com\/2024\/04\/29\/c-section-rate-high-why-risks\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">32.4% of all births in 2023<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Additionally, the trial was not necessarily representative of low-risk women who elect to be induced, since participants didn\u2019t get to choose whether they\u2019d be in the induction group or the spontaneous labor group. In fact, 73% of the women who were asked to participate declined\u2014perhaps because they weren&#8217;t able to choose which arm (experimental or control) in which they would ultimately end up, and may have had strong preferences for one over another.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-australian-research-study-contradicts-arrive-findings\"><span id=\"australian-research-study-contradicts-arrive-findings\">Australian research study contradicts ARRIVE findings<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1111\/birt.12806\">New research out of Victoria, Australia<\/a> challenges whether real-life birth scenarios show comparable results to the highly-controlled ARRIVE trial. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Like the ARRIVE researchers, the Australian researchers also aimed to examine the association between induced labor and Cesarean birth. But rather than having a controlled group study like ARRIVE did, the Australian researchers used the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection from 2010-2018 for every birth in Victoria after 20 weeks gestation (a total of 640,191 births), to assess induction rates and their relationship to caesarean rates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-pullquote\"><blockquote><p>The Australian researchers found that when labor was induced in low-risk women from 37 to 41 weeks gestation, the rates of C-sections were higher by approximately <em>23-43%<\/em>, compared to women who went into labor on their own. <\/p><cite><a href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1111\/birt.12806\">&#8220;Induction of labor and cesarean birth in lower-risk nulliparous women at term: A retrospective cohort study&#8221;<\/a><\/cite><\/blockquote><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Australian researchers found that when labor was induced in low-risk women from 37 to 41 weeks gestation, the rates of C-sections were higher by approximately <em>23-43%<\/em> compared to women who went into labor on their own. They did find that the perinatal mortality rate was slightly <em>higher<\/em> among the expectant management group, but only after 40 weeks gestation. Ultimately, the researchers recommended that women be fully informed about the risks<em> and<\/em> benefits of elective inductions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-if-your-provider-offers-induction-use-this-tool-to-help-you-decide\"><span id=\"if-your-provider-offers-induction-use-this-tool-to-help-you-decide\">If your provider offers induction, use this tool to help you decide<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Australian research, reflecting real-world experiences, confirms what many <a href=\"https:\/\/internationaldoulainstitute.com\/2024\/01\/new-study-induction-of-labor-increases-risk-of-c-section-might-contradict-arrive-study\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">already knew<\/a>: that low-risk pregnant women often fare better when they&#8217;re allowed to go into labor on their own. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If you are offered an induction, especially for non-emergent reasons, you can use the acronym BRAIN from the <a href=\"https:\/\/internationaldoulainstitute.com\/2024\/01\/new-study-induction-of-labor-increases-risk-of-c-section-might-contradict-arrive-study\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">International Doula Institute<\/a> as a tool to help you evaluate this suggested intervention:&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>B<\/strong>enefit: What are the benefits for me and\/or my baby?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>R<\/strong>isks: What risks does this plan introduce for me and\/or my baby?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>A<\/strong>lternatives: What alternatives are available?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>I<\/strong>ntuition: How am I feeling about this decision?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>N<\/strong>othing: If I choose to do nothing right now, what risks and benefits are introduced?&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As with everything in women\u2019s health, you deserve to be an informed participant in your healthcare. Every woman, birth, and baby is different, meaning induction will make sense for some women. But the Australian research is a strong reminder that letting nature take its course should be the default option for women (and their babies) who don\u2019t necessitate intervention. No matter what, understanding the risks and benefits of every option will allow you to be more at peace with whatever birth decision you make.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-additional-reading\"><span id=\"additional-reading\">Additional Reading:<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/reasons-to-be-induced\/\">Why be induced?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/should-i-have-induction-for-big-baby\/\">Is a \u201cbig baby\u201d a good reason to have an induction?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/pitocin-alternatives\/\">I\u2019m being induced. Do I have options besides Pitocin?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/oxytocin-vs-pitocin-whats-the-difference\/\">Induction drug Pitocin is not the same as natural oxytocin: Some cautions for new moms<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-references-nbsp\"><span id=\"references\">References:&nbsp;<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[1] Simpson, Kathleen Rice PhD, RNC, CNS-BC, FAAN.&nbsp;Trends in Labor Induction in the United States, 1989 to 2020. MCN, The American Journal of Maternal\/Child Nursing 47(4):p 235, July\/August 2022. | DOI: 10.1097\/NMC.0000000000000824<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[2] Butler SE, Wallace EM, Bisits A, Selvaratnam RJ, Davey MA. Induction of labor and cesarean birth in lower-risk nulliparous women at term: A retrospective cohort study. Birth. 2024 Jan 3. doi: 10.1111\/birt.12806. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38173333.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">[3] Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom EA, El-Sayed YY, Perez-Delboy A, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Boggess KA, Chauhan SP, Iams JD, Chien EK, Casey BM, Gibbs RS, Srinivas SK, Swamy GK, Simhan HN, Macones GA; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal\u2013Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056\/NEJMoa1800566. PMID: 30089070; PMCID: PMC6186292.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Seg\u00fan un nuevo estudio, la gesti\u00f3n expectante es lo mejor","protected":false},"author":110,"featured_media":21256,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":true,"_kad_blocks_custom_css":"","_kad_blocks_head_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_body_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_footer_custom_js":"","csco_singular_sidebar":"","csco_page_header_type":"","csco_page_load_nextpost":"","csco_post_video_location":[],"csco_post_video_url":"","csco_post_video_bg_start_time":0,"csco_post_video_bg_end_time":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5378,5185],"tags":[5627,5639,4782],"class_list":["post-21258","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-labor-delivery","category-pregnancy-childbirth","tag-induction","tag-induction-risks","tag-labor-induction","cs-entry","cs-video-wrap"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v28.1 (Yoast SEO v28.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Was the ARRIVE labor induction trial wrong? - Natural Womanhood<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"After the ARRIVE trial came out in 2018, many said elective induction at 39 weeks gestation could decrease C section rates. But is that true?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/es\/llegar-a-juicio\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_MX\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Was the ARRIVE labor induction trial wrong?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"New research says expectant management is best\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/es\/llegar-a-juicio\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Natural Womanhood\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/NaturalWomanhood\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-15T13:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-09-18T18:22:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/AdobeStock_122216423-1-scaled.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1707\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Melayna Alicea\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@naturwomanhood\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@naturwomanhood\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Escrito por\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Melayna Alicea\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Tiempo de lectura\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/arrive-trial\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/arrive-trial\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Melayna Alicea\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/4d4de1374089d7f5ab1c67ae9ceb83f2\"},\"headline\":\"Was the ARRIVE labor induction trial wrong?\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-15T13:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-18T18:22:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/arrive-trial\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1185,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/arrive-trial\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/AdobeStock_122216423-1-scaled.jpeg\",\"keywords\":[\"induction\",\"induction risks\",\"labor induction\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Labor &amp; Delivery\",\"Pregnancy &amp; Childbirth\"],\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/arrive-trial\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/arrive-trial\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/arrive-trial\\\/\",\"name\":\"Was the ARRIVE labor induction trial wrong? - Natural Womanhood\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/arrive-trial\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/arrive-trial\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/AdobeStock_122216423-1-scaled.jpeg\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-15T13:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-09-18T18:22:06+00:00\",\"description\":\"After the ARRIVE trial came out in 2018, many said elective induction at 39 weeks gestation could decrease C section rates. But is that true?\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/arrive-trial\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/arrive-trial\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/arrive-trial\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/AdobeStock_122216423-1-scaled.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/AdobeStock_122216423-1-scaled.jpeg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1707,\"caption\":\"ARRIVE trial wrong, ARRIVE trial contradicted, labor induction, labor induction lower c section rates, induction lower c sections, labor induction raises c section rates,\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/arrive-trial\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Was the ARRIVE labor induction trial wrong?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/\",\"name\":\"Natural Womanhood\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Natural Womanhood\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"\",\"contentUrl\":\"\",\"caption\":\"Natural Womanhood\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/NaturalWomanhood\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/naturwomanhood\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/naturalwomanhood\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/natural-womanhood\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCt5gjuXYioYkx31Iq4tHLGg\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/4d4de1374089d7f5ab1c67ae9ceb83f2\",\"name\":\"Melayna Alicea\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/IMG_5661-1-jpg-webp.webp\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/IMG_5661-1-jpg-webp.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/IMG_5661-1-jpg-webp.webp\",\"caption\":\"Melayna Alicea\"},\"description\":\"Melayna Alicea is a wife and mother of three boys. She works from home as a freelance writer, editor, and FEMM Fertility Care Practitioner. Melayna is passionate about helping women discover the beauty of their bodies and achieve holistic health. She also believes firmly in educating men about fertility awareness, so they can honor women's bodies and be better partners. For Melayna, fertility awareness has become a way of life that allows her to show up as her best for her family on a daily basis, and she hopes that, through her writing, others are able to experience that same freedom\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/naturalwomanhood.org\\\/es\\\/author\\\/malicea\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u00bfFue err\u00f3neo el ensayo de inducci\u00f3n del parto ARRIVE? - Femineidad natural","description":"Despu\u00e9s de que el ensayo ARRIVE saliera a la luz en 2018, muchos dijeron que la inducci\u00f3n electiva a las 39 semanas de gestaci\u00f3n podr\u00eda disminuir las tasas de ces\u00e1rea. Pero, \u00bfes eso cierto?","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/es\/llegar-a-juicio\/","og_locale":"es_MX","og_type":"article","og_title":"Was the ARRIVE labor induction trial wrong?","og_description":"New research says expectant management is best","og_url":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/es\/llegar-a-juicio\/","og_site_name":"Natural Womanhood","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/NaturalWomanhood","article_published_time":"2024-08-15T13:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-09-18T18:22:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1707,"url":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/AdobeStock_122216423-1-scaled.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Melayna Alicea","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@naturwomanhood","twitter_site":"@naturwomanhood","twitter_misc":{"Escrito por":"Melayna Alicea","Tiempo de lectura":"6 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/arrive-trial\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/arrive-trial\/"},"author":{"name":"Melayna Alicea","@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/#\/schema\/person\/4d4de1374089d7f5ab1c67ae9ceb83f2"},"headline":"Was the ARRIVE labor induction trial wrong?","datePublished":"2024-08-15T13:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-18T18:22:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/arrive-trial\/"},"wordCount":1185,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/arrive-trial\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/AdobeStock_122216423-1-scaled.jpeg","keywords":["induction","induction risks","labor induction"],"articleSection":["Labor &amp; Delivery","Pregnancy &amp; Childbirth"],"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/arrive-trial\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/arrive-trial\/","url":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/arrive-trial\/","name":"\u00bfFue err\u00f3neo el ensayo de inducci\u00f3n del parto ARRIVE? - Femineidad natural","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/arrive-trial\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/arrive-trial\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/AdobeStock_122216423-1-scaled.jpeg","datePublished":"2024-08-15T13:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2024-09-18T18:22:06+00:00","description":"Despu\u00e9s de que el ensayo ARRIVE saliera a la luz en 2018, muchos dijeron que la inducci\u00f3n electiva a las 39 semanas de gestaci\u00f3n podr\u00eda disminuir las tasas de ces\u00e1rea. Pero, \u00bfes eso cierto?","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/arrive-trial\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/arrive-trial\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/arrive-trial\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/AdobeStock_122216423-1-scaled.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/AdobeStock_122216423-1-scaled.jpeg","width":2560,"height":1707,"caption":"ARRIVE trial wrong, ARRIVE trial contradicted, labor induction, labor induction lower c section rates, induction lower c sections, labor induction raises c section rates,"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/arrive-trial\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Was the ARRIVE labor induction trial wrong?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/","name":"Natural Womanhood","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/#organization","name":"Natural Womanhood","url":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"","contentUrl":"","caption":"Natural Womanhood"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/NaturalWomanhood","https:\/\/x.com\/naturwomanhood","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/naturalwomanhood\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/natural-womanhood\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCt5gjuXYioYkx31Iq4tHLGg"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/#\/schema\/person\/4d4de1374089d7f5ab1c67ae9ceb83f2","name":"Melayna Alicea","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/IMG_5661-1-jpg-webp.webp","url":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/IMG_5661-1-jpg-webp.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/IMG_5661-1-jpg-webp.webp","caption":"Melayna Alicea"},"description":"Melayna Alicea es esposa y madre de tres hijos. Trabaja desde casa como escritora independiente, editora y practicante de cuidados de fertilidad FEMM. Melayna es una apasionada de ayudar a las mujeres a descubrir la belleza de sus cuerpos y lograr una salud hol\u00edstica. Tambi\u00e9n cree firmemente en educar a los hombres sobre el conocimiento de la fertilidad, para que puedan honrar los cuerpos de las mujeres y ser mejores compa\u00f1eros. Para Melayna, el conocimiento de la fertilidad se ha convertido en una forma de vida que le permite mostrar lo mejor de s\u00ed misma para su familia cada d\u00eda, y espera que, a trav\u00e9s de sus escritos, otras personas puedan experimentar la misma libertad.","url":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/es\/author\/malicea\/"}]}},"taxonomy_info":{"category":[{"value":5378,"label":"Labor &amp; Delivery"},{"value":5185,"label":"Pregnancy &amp; Childbirth"}],"post_tag":[{"value":5627,"label":"induction"},{"value":5639,"label":"induction risks"},{"value":4782,"label":"labor induction"}]},"featured_image_src_large":["https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/AdobeStock_122216423-1-1024x683.jpeg",1024,683,true],"author_info":{"display_name":"Melayna Alicea","author_link":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/es\/author\/malicea\/"},"comment_info":0,"category_info":[{"term_id":5378,"name":"Labor &amp; Delivery","slug":"labor-delivery","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":5378,"taxonomy":"category","description":"Homebirth, birth center, hospital. How can you have the best birth, no matter where and how your baby is born? Whether you're planning for vaginal or caesarean, medicated or unmedicated, we've got the info about all your birth options covered. ","parent":5185,"count":44,"filter":"raw","term_order":"0","cat_ID":5378,"category_count":44,"category_description":"Homebirth, birth center, hospital. How can you have the best birth, no matter where and how your baby is born? Whether you're planning for vaginal or caesarean, medicated or unmedicated, we've got the info about all your birth options covered. ","cat_name":"Labor &amp; Delivery","category_nicename":"labor-delivery","category_parent":5185},{"term_id":5185,"name":"Pregnancy &amp; Childbirth","slug":"pregnancy-childbirth","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":5185,"taxonomy":"category","description":"What the research does (and doesn't) say about how to have your healthiest pregnancy, labor, and birth, plus answers to your questions about unmedicated labor. ","parent":0,"count":173,"filter":"raw","term_order":"0","cat_ID":5185,"category_count":173,"category_description":"What the research does (and doesn't) say about how to have your healthiest pregnancy, labor, and birth, plus answers to your questions about unmedicated labor. ","cat_name":"Pregnancy &amp; Childbirth","category_nicename":"pregnancy-childbirth","category_parent":0}],"tag_info":[{"term_id":5627,"name":"induction","slug":"induction","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":5627,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":6,"filter":"raw","term_order":"0"},{"term_id":5639,"name":"induction risks","slug":"induction-risks","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":5639,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":2,"filter":"raw","term_order":"0"},{"term_id":4782,"name":"labor induction","slug":"labor-induction","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":4782,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":6,"filter":"raw","term_order":"0"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21258","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/110"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21258"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21258\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/21256"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21258"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21258"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naturalwomanhood.org\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21258"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}